> they have to explain at length My reaction to the article was that they're using a lot of words to explain this change. That suggested to me that maybe they

> they have to explain at length My reaction to the article was that they're using a lot of words to explain this change. That suggested to me that maybe they aren't being completely candid. I've never used Signal, because (a) I don't want to rely on a smartphone, and (b) I don't want to use my phone-number as my ID, because it's traceable. I can't work out from the TFA verbiage whether this change addresses my concerns or not. That in itself is concerning, to me.