Yeah I can't imagine using the current model as part of an API (a popular use case for GPT-4) having seen this. I'm not sure it impacted their API edition of GP

Yeah I can't imagine using the current model as part of an API (a popular use case for GPT-4) having seen this. I'm not sure it impacted their API edition of GPT-4 but this plainly shows how it could have given it leaked into another service in production, and that's bad enough. I think GPT is fundamentally not good enough as an AI model. Another issue is hallucinations and how to resolve them, and an understanding of how information is stored in this black box and how to / if data can be extracted. We have a long way to go and probably all these topics need to be answered first out of accuracy and even legal reasons. Up until then, GPT-4 should be treated as a convincing chat experiment. Don't base your startup or whatever on it. Use it as assistant where replies are provided in digestible and supervised fashion (NOT fed into another system) and you're an expert on the involved system itself and can easily see when it's wrong. Don't use GPT-4 to become an expert on something when you're a novice yourself.