> They infringe on our rights. Do you really believe there is a right to harass others? It depends on your definition of "harass", but yes, absolutely. You hav

> They infringe on our rights. Do you really believe there is a right to harass others? It depends on your definition of "harass", but yes, absolutely. You have a right to express, including through protest, your opinions to others who don't want to hear them. Specifically, there is no right to not be harassed. There are laws against certain forms of it, but that's not a 'right' in a traditional sense, like the right to free speech, or 'life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness'. Obviously, 'harassment' is such a broad term, it's a way to censor and oppress and especially to silence anyone who disagrees with the status quo. They must allow the status quo to continue or they are harassers. >> And who are you to tell other Americans what's American or not? > I'm an American. I have relatives that fought in the Revolutionary War, the Civil War, WW1, WW2, and the Korean War. The other people are Americans too; you have no extra rights there. What you or your relatives did gives you no extra rights at all under any law or democratic custom. > I see people all the time eager to throw away our rights that were so bitterly fought for. That's what I see you advocating, trying to suppress dissent that you don't like. > our freedoms do not include the right to impede other peoples' rights to go about their business. They absolutely do, again depending the definition of "impede". That's what protest is, and you can see it in protests going back centuries. It's a free country and you're going to have to deal with people doing things you don't like. Also, it's an argument for the status quo - going about their business may mean impeding others' rights. As the admittedly over-simplistic example, slave merchants impeded others' rights, and impeding the merchants protected rights.