3 ms·
IIRC that's more than CHIPs Act, but it's 2024, Sam wants (lol) 7T for OpenAI hardware, I can't tell what's a lot of money anymore.
by maxglute 3y ago
IIRC that's more than CHIPs Act, but it's 2024, Sam wants (lol) 7T for OpenAI hardware, I can't tell what's a lot of money anymore.
- baq 3y agowhy not 8
- supafastcoder 3y agohttps://x.com/sama/status/1758347811786281355?s=46 https://x.com/sama/status/1758347811786281355?s=46
- ben_w 3y agoI'm sure 7T is someone having a laugh, not a real thing that's actually being attempted. I wonder what it would cost to outright buy Australia, in the sense of convincing enough voters to make you their absolute monarch…
- hardware2win 3y agoWell, current bleeding edge semicos require like hundreds of billions if you start from 0 Meanwhile what about those materials that could allow you to make 1000x faster cpus, but we arent capable of manufacturing them at scale and also their lifespan is way shorter than silicon. Im not saying 7T is reasonable, but if thats what he want to do, then it is very interesting and expensive as hell
- giireon 3y ago7T is price anchoring at it's best. When he gets 1T it will seem normal.
- soneca 3y agoOr price anchoring at its worst. When he gets 100B it will look like a failure.
- rjmunro 3y agoI had to Google 7T. I assume you mean $7 Trillion, not some new chip or fab technology.