Part of it is that it's not just named parameters: you should have a good story for default parameters too, and I think one or two others? Variadrics feels simi

Part of it is that it's not just named parameters: you should have a good story for default parameters too, and I think one or two others? Variadrics feels similar but separate. Oh, anonymous structs would allow you to emulate them while not adding the feature directly. Therefore, it ends up being a really huge thing, with lots of design space. This is combined with the fact that > they would also provide an easy, unambiguous way to "overload" functions Not everyone sees this as a good thing. Being slightly controversial, plus being really large, plus there being a lot of other things to do, would make me surprised if they ever land. Here's a link from eight years ago with a link to lots of other related proposals: https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/pre-rfc-named-arguments/3831 https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/pre-rfc-named-arguments/38...