I think categorizing US employees for gender and race is widely accepted and widely done. Disclosing the board members as "unknown/undisclosed" for LGBTQ+ statu

I think categorizing US employees for gender and race is widely accepted and widely done. Disclosing the board members as "unknown/undisclosed" for LGBTQ+ status would seem to have to be permitted under the rule (which it does by my naive/lay reading, perhaps with a required explanation, which could be "we choose not to require the answering of invasive personal questions from any of our community, including our board.")