> The idea that we need to protect the rights of the powerful majority to live without challenge is a brazen misuse of civil rights No one is argueing this. Ce

> The idea that we need to protect the rights of the powerful majority to live without challenge is a brazen misuse of civil rights No one is argueing this. Certainly I didn't argue this, and I'm not reading it anywhere in this letter either. This conversation is turning unpleasant because for the second time now you're taking extremist interpretations of everything.