> One of the problems with a lot of the liberal arts curriculum today is that every university tends to slant the same way with the same topics. They all come t

> One of the problems with a lot of the liberal arts curriculum today is that every university tends to slant the same way with the same topics. They all come to same conclusions on non-deterministic, subjective ideas. There's a missing counterweight in may cases that exists to critique, ridicule, and otherwise keep in check opposing ideas. What is that based on? People I know in universities are exposed to a very wide range of ideas. In the OP, isn't it the conservatives who are suppressing ideas?