Thank you! This is a really good example of assuming that topics as things in themselves have the essential characteristic of neutrality. Which is itself a pos

Thank you! This is a really good example of assuming that topics as things in themselves have the essential characteristic of neutrality. Which is itself a position. The opposite of which is that things don't have an essential characteristic of neutrality.[1] Sorry, but there's no escape hatch in the hard sciences; there's only one level of indirection. For any topic, I can generate a frame[2] in which it takes a non-neutral position. That's why neutrality doesn't exist. 1. teach the controversy, both sides! (in jest) 2. See Frame Analysis, Erving Goffman