3 ms·
I don't think that's necessarily true. Regardless, corporate tax avoidance is well documented. Suggesting that because they avoided it once the benefactor need
by anotherhue 3y ago
I don't think that's necessarily true.
Regardless, corporate tax avoidance is well documented. Suggesting that because they avoided it once the benefactor needn't pay meaningful tax on receipt is borderline facetious.
- tpm 3y ago> Regardless, corporate tax avoidance is well documented. Yes. But taxing the revenue is a) already sort of done through VAT (if selling to public etc) and b) not a very good idea in general - it will make prices of everything higher for everyone. If a company is a low-margin mass-producer, their prices will be immediately +Tax%. This, to be popular, would mean the revenue tax would have to be low, which sort of defeats the original purpose. > they avoided it once who avoided what?