> When presented in that light, it is not surprising that it would be treated as treasonous. And if presented in a different light, it'd be surprising. But the

> When presented in that light, it is not surprising that it would be treated as treasonous. And if presented in a different light, it'd be surprising. But the more imporant question is why would you need to present anything based on that or another theory instead of validating it with data from those who actually make those rules and categorize it as treason?