2 ms·
Mozilla's WebRender. It's actually a better option by their own criteria because it's developed as a standalone reusable library.
by marwis 3y ago
Mozilla's WebRender. It's actually a better option by their own criteria because it's developed as a standalone reusable library.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- mort96 3y agoOh I read the article with the assumption that this was 2D canvas rendering, but upon re-reading it I see that it's probably about normal web content. WebRender would've been a terrible fit for Canvas, but it would certainly make sense if this is about rendering normal web content.