3 ms·
No one actually knows "what matters" yet, and also no one knows whether or not you actually need "new models." Everything you're saying right now is extremely
by jrm4 3y ago
No one actually knows "what matters" yet, and also no one knows whether or not you actually need "new models."
Everything you're saying right now is extremely hypothetical.
The tech is very shiny, no doubt about that. But it's wildly conclusory to think "Yes, there will definitely be a demand for new use cases AND ALSO you definitely will be unable to create those new models without big money investment."
Again, it sounds to me exactly like someone clamoring for "big investment in a new, revolutionary, operating system." Nothing at all inevitable about that for MANY reasons, most having to do with "incremental building on the past thing that already works is probably the most feasible."
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- stale2002 3y ago> and also no one knows whether or not you actually need "new models." All the more reason to not make it illegal to train these new models. There are massively improved models coming out once a month. There could be many more to come. As you said, we don't even know where this stops! and the current innovation is very large right now. Therefore, it is premature to just ban all of that, when we don't even know how much more innovation there is to go. So the point stands. The massive amount of innovation that has helped open source has all been driving by these new models being released. And there could be many more to come. > Everything you're saying right now is extremely hypothetical. Looking at the fact that we come out with a powerful new model every month is not hypothetical. I am referencing existing reality here.