17 ms·
I'd say that if one is considering a male to female sexual re-assignment, then perhaps this can be considered on the "pro" side of the cost/benefit analysis.
by silverquiet 3y ago
I'd say that if one is considering a male to female sexual re-assignment, then perhaps this can be considered on the "pro" side of the cost/benefit analysis.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- riehwvfbk 3y agoUm, regardless of how woke you are, that is not how biology works. Biologically this person would still be male and would not get the cardiovascular benefits.
- silverquiet 3y agoI don't think that's entirely obvious; I'd actually be quite interested to see a study on it. Artificially modifying the hormones of a human can cause significant changes. It's particularly obvious in trans males; lowered voice, facial hair growth, and increased muscle are all effects. It doesn't seem crazy to me to think that there may also be cardiovascular changes.