> Python's decent at this too. It's almost pseudocode. Nim has Python-like syntax. But, I find it even easier to read/parse at a glance than Python. Also, I ha

> Python's decent at this too. It's almost pseudocode. Nim has Python-like syntax. But, I find it even easier to read/parse at a glance than Python. Also, I hate that in languages with dynamic typing you have to read whole function to understand what type of arguments it takes and what is the return type. Nim is statically-typed, so all the types are properly declared.