3 ms·
Sure thing. People really don't learn the history of AI any more apparently or this question wouldn't come up all the time. There is basically any number of q
by chx 3y ago
Sure thing.
People really don't learn the history of AI any more apparently or this question wouldn't come up all the time.
There is basically any number of questions you can ask a two year old human who have never encountered that question nor anything even remotely similar to it and yet they can answer without fail. Meanwhile absolutely no AI can answer these unless the specific question / the rules underlying the questions were previously fed into it. The textbook example is "If Susan goes shopping will her head go with her?" Of course, since this specific question is literally a textbook one, you can't fool an LLM with it but it's easy to come up with brand new ones.
In the early 1980s this stopped Douglas Lenat who has worked very successfully on discovery systems and made him turn to assembling these facts and rules into CyC.
- famouswaffles 3y agoYou've not quantified anything, nor have you even provided any valid example of these so abundant mystery questions. If it's so easy, come up with one and show us.
- chx 3y agoIf I do then it'll get gobbled up by fake AI and I won't make up one every time ignorant people who can't open an AI textbook demand one from me. Apropos: https://existentialcomics.com/comic/289 https://existentialcomics.com/comic/289 You could use that comics to generate a few of these questions.
- famouswaffles 3y agoWhat a ridiculous excuse. Leaving aside the fact the chances of your reply being in the training of the next GPT near 0, it certainly won't happen anywhere near fast enough to disprove your point to anyone reading this today. So you have nothing. Not that i'm surprised.
- chx 3y agoNo, the automated plagiarism machines have nothing and I am not obligated to cure your ignorance. Let's continue the conversation after you read an AI textbook, shall we?
- famouswaffles 3y agoYou're not obligated to do anything but then responding to a comment asking for quantification with "Trust me bro" is weak to say the least.