You think it's unfair to ask whether a simulation of a person can think in a discussion on whether some particular class of algorithm can think? Lacking a clear

You think it's unfair to ask whether a simulation of a person can think in a discussion on whether some particular class of algorithm can think? Lacking a clear definition of what exactly an LLM is and what thinking is, I can't think of a single more germane question (aside from what those definitions are, I suppose).