3 ms·
You mean these highly anthropomorphised programs? It’s important that technical people don’t anthropomorphise them? I agree but the creators of all the main LL
by Affric 3y ago
You mean these highly anthropomorphised programs? It’s important that technical people don’t anthropomorphise them?
I agree but the creators of all the main LLMs have already crossed the line by a long way. E.g. It’s deeply troubling that it’s acceptable that LLMs deliver inline apologies.
- genman 3y agoThese "apologies" are something that deeply irritates me.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- cyanydeez 3y agoit's kinda amusing because the LLMs evolved via selection of the best anthropic traits because the basic digested mountains of undiscerning information. so the gullibility is merely one selected for trait convolution with state.
- daveguy 3y agoThere is no evolution or trait selection involved in the training of LLMs. LLMs are statistical estimators of most likely next series of tokens. Those next series of tokens seem anthropic because most of the input was human generated text.