3 ms·
It's not like that at all. It's more like "don't sell F22s to anyone else" then Lockheed makes a slightly slower and less stealthy export model to skirt the rul
by __loam 3y ago
It's not like that at all. It's more like "don't sell F22s to anyone else" then Lockheed makes a slightly slower and less stealthy export model to skirt the rules. It's obvious that Nvidia is acting in bad faith, and it's funny that the same people who said we need to maintain an edge over China are probably defending Nvidia doing this.
- declaredapple 3y ago> "don't sell F22s to anyone else" What they actually said (abbreviated) was anything with more then > "600 Gbyte/s [memory transfer speed]" or 4800TOPS Page 103 https://public-inspection.federalregister.gov/2022-21658.pdf https://public-inspection.federalregister.gov/2022-21658.pdf They set very specific performance restrictions, not a general "don't sell fast stuff plz"
- __loam 3y agoI don't really care about what exactly they said, it's obvious to anyone with a brain that the intention of this restriction is to keep China from getting the highest end chips for AI development and putting a chip, that didn't exist when the regulation was written, right up against the restriction was obviously bad faith on Nvidia's part.