2 ms·
IMO, regulation is supposed to be “we think this is the line that makes chip too dangerous”. And nvidia is complying with that. If the danger line is 80%, why n
by cherioo 3y ago
IMO, regulation is supposed to be “we think this is the line that makes chip too dangerous”. And nvidia is complying with that. If the danger line is 80%, why not set the line at 81%
The administration feels like it’s throwing a tantrum about an extra 19% of performance. The fact that that even matters, or the premise that chip is dangerous, are both just funny (not so fun for nvidia)