Well done for launching this. This goes in line of what I said before [0] about Leetcode being a less useful measure of a candidate's ability given that it can

Well done for launching this. This goes in line of what I said before [0] about Leetcode being a less useful measure of a candidate's ability given that it can be gamed easily via ChatGPT and LLMs writing code quicker and much better. Code reviews either closed-source or in the open (with optional evidence of some contributions to open source projects or having their own) makes it a far and much better holistic measure of a candidate's ability than memorizing rehased Leetcode / Hackerrank questions that LLMs have already been trained on them and can be gamed quite easily as shown in this experiment. [1] As LLMs only get better, Leetcode, Hackerrank, etc will cease to become a good measure of programmer ability other than being gamed to the ground. [0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39209673 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39209673 [1] https://interviewing.io/blog/how-hard-is-it-to-cheat-with-chatgpt-in-technical-interviews https://interviewing.io/blog/how-hard-is-it-to-cheat-with-ch...