The frequency doesn't negate conceptual flaw in reasoning. It also most likely stems from serious underuse of multiple cursors (another vim's flaw), which reduc

The frequency doesn't negate conceptual flaw in reasoning. It also most likely stems from serious underuse of multiple cursors (another vim's flaw), which reduces the frequency of cases where it's not necessary > quite definite as to what constitutes ... sentence, ... so you don’t even have to think about it. My very first example doesn't depend on the strictness of definition, it's your eyes that aren't definite enough and need help with selection to show what operation will affect. Also strictness is less powerful, not more