Thanks for digging up the details! Digital sovereignty might have been the initial reason (and a sensible one). What's actually being delivered seems to be a D

Thanks for digging up the details! Digital sovereignty might have been the initial reason (and a sensible one). What's actually being delivered seems to be a DNS service for blocking malicious sites with real time threat intelligence feeds, for Telcos to upsell to their customers with antivirus-style security scaremongering. That difference in focus is pretty troubling. It's taking away focus from the important part of delivering a robust DNS service, making the service more expensive to build out initially, and then also making it far more expensive to operate in perpetuity since they'll be spending the large majority of their time on maintaining the threat intel.