4 ms·
It's pretty easy to do some math on this. There are pseudonymous background music artists who have just released one or two tracks, and who have more listens t
by vintermann 3y ago
It's pretty easy to do some math on this.
There are pseudonymous background music artists who have just released one or two tracks, and who have more listens than famous bands with a 30-year history, because they were featured in one of Spotify's background music playlists. It is of course rumours that this music is commissioned by Spotify (which they deny) or that they get kickbacks in some other form.
You don't get exact numbers (because Spotify won't share them!) but there's no question background music is vastly more profitable on Spotify than the kind of music people go to concerts for, and it's at the latter's expense.
- stdbrouw 3y agoThat's a good point and a legitimate reason to get rid of the pool, but I guess I was talking more about often-voiced worries that big artists are getting richer and indie artists are getting poorer due to Spotify's algorithm -- and those worries long predate the weird ambient stuff.
- mr_toad 3y agoIf background music is the reason people are paying for Spotify then what would you expect Spotify to do?