> Not sure I understand your point. The problem is using Treesitter (for syntax highlighting and "semantic movements") and an LSP at the same time. So if your

> Not sure I understand your point. The problem is using Treesitter (for syntax highlighting and "semantic movements") and an LSP at the same time. So if your language has a LSP, using Treesitter additionally is redundant at best and introduces inconcistency at worst. I'm not talking about using Treesitter as the parser for the LSP. > Most popular languages have language-specific tools I'd say even less popular langauges like Coq^H^H^HRocq, Lean 4, Koka, Idris, Unison, ... have their "own" tools, I do not know of a language that uses a Treesitter parser in its LSP, but I do know about tools like https://semgrep.dev/ https://semgrep.dev/ (written in OCaml) and Github's code search which use Treesitter.