3 ms·
> I don't think other music services are materially different They very much do if you care about audio quality. Spotify still doesn't support high-res audio
by threeseed 3y ago
> I don't think other music services are materially different
They very much do if you care about audio quality.
Spotify still doesn't support high-res audio e.g. CD quality and above.
- platelminto 3y agoFor people that used to enjoy Spotify, such as myself & the author, this was never a main concern.
- nusl 3y agoWhich services would you recommend as alternatives for higher quality audio at similar price points?
- jm547ster 3y agoApple Music if you're in that ecosystem
- robin_reala 3y agoWhat ecosystem? It’s on Android and Windows too, and has a web version for Linux use.
- Scarjit 3y agoI have Tidal HiFi-Plus (19.99 Euro/month [up to 24-bit, 192 kHz]), but i can't really say that i would recommend it. There is also HiFi (10.99/month [up to 16-bit, 44.1 kHz]). My biggest problems with Tidal (except for the price) are: - Music suddenly becomes unavailable (greyed out), only to be become available under the same name later again (but you need to manually re-add it to playlists). - Sometimes it just stops the playback and if i resume it always jumps to one specific song. I cannot say anything about the mobile player, as i only use it on PC. Alternativly: Just buy the music you like as FLAC.
- nusl 3y agoThanks. I tried Tidal for a while. The experience was pretty good and audio quality too. Not quite worth the price for me though. Will try Apple Music since I have that with Apple One.