5 ms·
Not hard to anticipate how this might play out. I can see how it first becomes the "official" resolver, which in a later steps is maybe "recommended," then requ
by febeling 3y ago
Not hard to anticipate how this might play out. I can see how it first becomes the "official" resolver, which in a later steps is maybe "recommended," then required if you want certain kinds of funding or subsidy, or just serve public contracts, etc. Before you know it it's mandatory.
- zarzavat 3y agoThey can make it “mandatory” but if it sucks then people will just change their DNS to something else. The people who don’t know how to do that probably don’t leave the mainstream internet anyway.
- febeling 3y ago25 years ago I also had a lot of trust in freedom on the internet, because it would just "route around censorship" and all that. I don't have the same confidence anymore.
- zarzavat 3y agoThe internet seems to be doing just fine at routing around censorship. I can still access TPB and Libgen a multitude of different ways despite the efforts of my govt to block them. DNS is harder to block because it’s not illegal, and it’s a core internet service, which means there’s a lot of interest in preserving access.
- gryn 3y agoIt's a boiling frog situation, next step in that scenario is making illegal to change the DNS.
- codedokode 3y agoISPs will block DNS traffic to harmful DNS servers or reroute it to approved servers.
- zarzavat 3y agoVery difficult to even identify DNS traffic if it’s passing over DoH. EU moves far too slowly to stand a chance at blocking it. If your evil master plan involves winning against millions of horny teenagers: it’s bad plan.