Yeah, you know what, I agree. I think there's a way to get to this ruling without it being - well, without it being exactly what everyone thinks it is, but you'

Yeah, you know what, I agree. I think there's a way to get to this ruling without it being - well, without it being exactly what everyone thinks it is, but you're right, it's pretty clear after reading that concurrence that this wasn't some reasonable act of jurisprudence that will get twisted for nefarious means - the nefariousness was the purpose.