3 ms·
If the model is y = a + b * x + e, then we can precisely state probability distributions of a and b given x and y for reasonably general assumptions about error
by richrichie 3y ago
If the model is y = a + b * x + e, then we can precisely state probability distributions of a and b given x and y for reasonably general assumptions about error e.
If the model is y = f(x) + e, where for example f is a neural net, there is not much we can say about the “quality” of parameters of f. That is, we can’t attach confidence interval. We will have to resort to expensive simulations and for most practical applications this is not workable (size of dataset).
What you say is useful in a different context. Local linearization is a very powerful idea.
- whatshisface 3y agoMaybe not if there are many more parameters in f than there are samples in the dataset, but if there are a handful of parameters in f then a typical step is to take the inverse of the derivative of goodness-of-fit with respect to each fit parameter, to determine the precision with which each parameter was determined by the fit.