3 ms·
> I wonder what it is that leads to such inefficiency. My understanding is that there is little corporate funding available to resource compiler engineers to p
by ben0x539 3y ago
> I wonder what it is that leads to such inefficiency.
My understanding is that there is little corporate funding available to resource compiler engineers to prioritize "do nothing and exit" workloads.
- userbinator 3y agoIMHO it's nothing to do with "funding" (look at what comes out of the demoscene, for example); or perhaps you're espousing the same mentality that causes this. There isn't a need to "prioritize" anything, because these are really problems caused by doing unnecessary work in the first place: generating code for which the results of its execution will never be needed.
- ben0x539 3y agoThat's a weird rhethorical flourish. If there isn't a need to prioritize work to fix the thing we're complaining about, I guess we can stop complaining about it.
- userbinator 3y agoThat's what I'm saying: There would've been nothing to fix if they hadn't not cared at all about efficiency from the beginning, because such inefficiency would've never been created.