3 ms·
Read page 37 of the concurrence for a taste of how Alabama is going to treat this newfound precedent.. https://publicportal-api.alappeals.gov/courts/68f021c4-6
by mikeyouse 3y ago
Read page 37 of the concurrence for a taste of how Alabama is going to treat this newfound precedent..
https://publicportal-api.alappeals.gov/courts/68f021c4-6a44-4735-9a76-5360b2e8af13/cms/case/343D203A-B13D-463A-8176-C46E3AE4F695/docketentrydocuments/E3D95592-3CBE-4384-AFA6-063D4595AA1D https://publicportal-api.alappeals.gov/courts/68f021c4-6a44-...
- roughly 3y agoJust wanna say I applaud you for slogging through 130 pages of an Alabama Supreme Court ruling. But, yeah, I agree - whatever the actual legal reason and reasoning for this, there are going to be a lot of people rubbing their hands in anticipation at what they can do with this ruling.
- fabian2k 3y agoWhy is there a theological justification in a Supreme Court decision?
- silverquiet 3y agoThis seems like a rhetorical question if you have even a passing familiarity with Alabama.
- mikeyouse 3y agoBecause Alabama is going to Alabama.. anyone pretending like this is some reasonable pragmatic / secular ruling to deal with a negligent IVF clinic is lying.
- roughly 3y agoYeah, you know what, I agree. I think there's a way to get to this ruling without it being - well, without it being exactly what everyone thinks it is, but you're right, it's pretty clear after reading that concurrence that this wasn't some reasonable act of jurisprudence that will get twisted for nefarious means - the nefariousness was the purpose.