> And the motivation were things like not being able to get the temperature above 55ºF in the winter with the furnace running constantly. Well, that was the im

> And the motivation were things like not being able to get the temperature above 55ºF in the winter with the furnace running constantly. Well, that was the impetus, but the motivation was definitely to make an ecological point - which, to be clear, I’m for, but there’s no part of this that pencils out for $300k solely on the money. Taking a work of art like that house and making it net-zero energy while preserving what makes it so special would have been a hell of a feat.