4 ms·
All you're doing is making assumptions about the intent of the airline, based on nothing. Of course intent matters, who knows exactly why they posted his passpo
by dkjaudyeqooe 3y ago
All you're doing is making assumptions about the intent of the airline, based on nothing. Of course intent matters, who knows exactly why they posted his passport.
You also have no more information on the actions or intent of the youtuber than anyone, but you're defending him as the victim here, based solely on his questionable claims in the context of his fabulist videos.
- kmeisthax 3y ago>based on nothing Based on the fact that the airline posted his passport on Facebook. I have not seen the videos in question and probably never will. Let's say the airline is 100% correct and the YouTuber in question was trying to defame them for clout. That is plausible. But that still does not justify doxxing him, regardless of intent.
- dkjaudyeqooe 3y ago"Doxxing him" is just your view. Posting his passport may mean something completely different to them. Again, intent is all important here.
- lmm 3y ago> "Doxxing him" is just your view. No, it's a fact of what happened. Intent matters less than results. This is like looking at someone who got shot and saying "maybe this was just friendly banter".
- lmm 3y ago> You also have no more information on the actions or intent of the youtuber than anyone, but you're defending him as the victim here We know he's the victim because his passport got posted by the airline employee. That's inexcusable even if he was extorting them or whatever - he may not be innocent, but the airline is certainly guilty. (Unless you're suggesting he's faked the whole thing and, IDK, bribed someone to post his passport picture?)