3 ms·
Art is much less vulnerable. Art is very heavily tagged, accurately described and filtered. Many galleries don't accept AI art at all, which means to sneak in
by dale_glass 3y ago
Art is much less vulnerable.
Art is very heavily tagged, accurately described and filtered. Many galleries don't accept AI art at all, which means to sneak in the AI needs to be pretty much perfect.
Also, there's an enthusiastic scene of LoRAs where the makers work with small enough datasets to do manual curation.
- aj7 3y agoPhotography has been very well developed technically for almost a century. Yet very little is considered art. The most interesting AI art, to me, are “image compilations” where the compiler appears to have taken just a bit of LSD.
- y42 3y ago>> which means to sneak in the AI needs to be pretty much perfect That's status quo. Because right now artificial art is easy to distinguish form "natural art". Besides that I consider this - no offense! - as some kind of "arrogance". Galleries accept what they think what art is. Why can't I, the art consumer, decide for myself, what art is?