4 ms·

This is an guy who thrives on faux drama in his youtube videos (as is typical), harassing the national airline one of the poorest countries on earth. 20% of th

This is an guy who thrives on faux drama in his youtube videos (as is typical), harassing the national airline one of the poorest countries on earth. 20% of the population of East Timor is unemployed and 52.9% live on less than $1.25 a day. About half of the population is illiterate. What is being sold as revenge by all of these airline and points websites is more likely a lack of sophistication from the employee(s) in question, and likely having more pressing concerns than this guy. The first-world, monetised, exaggerated outrage and victim theater is sickening and for none of the reasons stated by this idiot influencer.

krisoft 3y ago
> This is an guy who thrives on faux drama in his youtube videos (as is typical), harassing the national airline one of the poorest countries on earth. So? If they have been wronged they should be free to post the email where the influencer was blackmailing them. What does publishing his passport achieve other than showing that they shouldn’t be trusted with a lemonade stand, let alone with being an airline. > likely having more pressing concerns than this guy Probably. In that case they should solve those problems and not engage with him.
kmeisthax 3y ago
You're defending a corporation that has doxxed a YouTuber for posting a critical review. This is censorship, plain and simple, whether or not the corporation in question intended it to be an attack. Even if it was an accident, which seems unlikely, wouldn't that vindicate the YouTuber's faux drama? See, this airline is so incompetently run that, when they complained about me, they made up shit and posted my passport instead of actual proof!
- dkjaudyeqooe 3y ago
  All you're doing is making assumptions about the intent of the airline, based on nothing. Of course intent matters, who knows exactly why they posted his passport. You also have no more information on the actions or intent of the youtuber than anyone, but you're defending him as the victim here, based solely on his questionable claims in the context of his fabulist videos.
  - kmeisthax 3y ago
    >based on nothing Based on the fact that the airline posted his passport on Facebook. I have not seen the videos in question and probably never will. Let's say the airline is 100% correct and the YouTuber in question was trying to defame them for clout. That is plausible. But that still does not justify doxxing him, regardless of intent.
    - dkjaudyeqooe 3y ago
      "Doxxing him" is just your view. Posting his passport may mean something completely different to them. Again, intent is all important here.
      - lmm 3y ago
        > "Doxxing him" is just your view. No, it's a fact of what happened. Intent matters less than results. This is like looking at someone who got shot and saying "maybe this was just friendly banter".
  - lmm 3y ago
    > You also have no more information on the actions or intent of the youtuber than anyone, but you're defending him as the victim here We know he's the victim because his passport got posted by the airline employee. That's inexcusable even if he was extorting them or whatever - he may not be innocent, but the airline is certainly guilty. (Unless you're suggesting he's faked the whole thing and, IDK, bribed someone to post his passport picture?)

krisoft 3y ago

> This is an guy who thrives on faux drama in his youtube videos (as is typical), harassing the national airline one of the poorest countries on earth. So? If they have been wronged they should be free to post the email where the influencer was blackmailing them. What does publishing his passport achieve other than showing that they shouldn’t be trusted with a lemonade stand, let alone with being an airline. > likely having more pressing concerns than this guy Probably. In that case they should solve those problems and not engage with him.

kmeisthax 3y ago

You're defending a corporation that has doxxed a YouTuber for posting a critical review. This is censorship, plain and simple, whether or not the corporation in question intended it to be an attack. Even if it was an accident, which seems unlikely, wouldn't that vindicate the YouTuber's faux drama? See, this airline is so incompetently run that, when they complained about me, they made up shit and posted my passport instead of actual proof!

dkjaudyeqooe 3y ago
All you're doing is making assumptions about the intent of the airline, based on nothing. Of course intent matters, who knows exactly why they posted his passport. You also have no more information on the actions or intent of the youtuber than anyone, but you're defending him as the victim here, based solely on his questionable claims in the context of his fabulist videos.
- kmeisthax 3y ago
  >based on nothing Based on the fact that the airline posted his passport on Facebook. I have not seen the videos in question and probably never will. Let's say the airline is 100% correct and the YouTuber in question was trying to defame them for clout. That is plausible. But that still does not justify doxxing him, regardless of intent.
  - dkjaudyeqooe 3y ago
    "Doxxing him" is just your view. Posting his passport may mean something completely different to them. Again, intent is all important here.
    - lmm 3y ago
      > "Doxxing him" is just your view. No, it's a fact of what happened. Intent matters less than results. This is like looking at someone who got shot and saying "maybe this was just friendly banter".
- lmm 3y ago
  > You also have no more information on the actions or intent of the youtuber than anyone, but you're defending him as the victim here We know he's the victim because his passport got posted by the airline employee. That's inexcusable even if he was extorting them or whatever - he may not be innocent, but the airline is certainly guilty. (Unless you're suggesting he's faked the whole thing and, IDK, bribed someone to post his passport picture?)