Advice from a professional arguer: You seem to deliberately not present tailwinds strongest arguments. For example, you claim their is no next step to abstrac

Advice from a professional arguer: You seem to deliberately not present tailwinds strongest arguments. For example, you claim their is no next step to abstraction, but literally in the paragraphs before the ones you quoted they say to build reusable html+css components instead of trying to make css only abstractions. Which very clearly responds to your argument and complaint. There are other places in your writing like this. It's fine to think and claim they are wrong. But it would be a lot more persuasive if you take them at their best and knock them down, instead of being selective. Overall take their absolute best case scenarios and reasons and show why you are still right.