I find your perspective interesting, because it somewhat matches my own on the diffusion based image models. Would you say that the output has changed, or that

I find your perspective interesting, because it somewhat matches my own on the diffusion based image models. Would you say that the output has changed, or that the output was originally novel to you and therefore useful, but now that same output style is no longer novel? I've certainly noticed that the output I get falls into a pattern a lot of the time and that rush of being presented with something new has gone.