3 ms·
Rather than jumping to conclusions, maybe a more favorable position would be to try to look into what's happening, before judging what others are doing/not doin
by diggan 3y ago
Rather than jumping to conclusions, maybe a more favorable position would be to try to look into what's happening, before judging what others are doing/not doing?
FWIW, it works perfectly fine for me on Linux with both Chrome and Firefox, so I'd say probably something is wonky in your environment, or a temporary issue on the website.
- burke 3y agoEven when it works (I’ve never seen this failure), this site is offensively unusable. Anchors don’t go to useful places; search doesn’t work in the MathJax regions… the writing also does a fairly poor job of communicating details in many cases. It’s really a truly terrible spec site.
- kevingadd 3y agoThe WASM spec ended up being a poor compromise between 'executable spec' (i.e. writing the spec entirely in ocaml or in a theorem prover language) and 'human readable spec' (i.e. the JavaScript or C# specs).