2 ms·
> If those circumstances aren't met, you don't burn fat at a rate that is sufficient for progress in a timeframe that satisfies most people's goals Irrelevant
by tekla 3y ago
> If those circumstances aren't met, you don't burn fat at a rate that is sufficient for progress in a timeframe that satisfies most people's goals
Irrelevant. Humans obey the laws of physics. An entire post of excuses. Eat less and you WILL lose weight. You can do it by eating nothing but sugar, Twinkies, or Big Macs. It doesn't matter. Many people have done this to disprove the bullshit that its more complicated than Calories In < Calories Out.
- ehnto 3y ago> Humans obey the laws of physics. We agree. > Eat less and you WILL lose weight. Over a long enough time period, inevitably yes. > You can do it by eating nothing but sugar, Twinkies, or Big Macs. Great I'll eat it all before bed each day. Should feel great. In the space between your advice, and actually losing weight, is the entirety of the rest of the task. Your advice is not helpful to anyone trying to lose weight. I see it countless times online. It's a pithy one liner people use as a morale high ground, but it's shallow and unhelpful.
- tekla 3y ago> Your advice is not helpful to anyone trying to lose weight Stop making excuses. Stop eating and you will lose weight. It works pretty well because physics is real.
- ehnto 3y agoSee what your advicd boils dowm to? "Stop eating". Yeah, no shit. Everyone understands calories in calories out, it's such a basic concept, it's the base fact almost all diets start from. You are adding nothing to the discussion and yet you think you've cracked the code. This is why seeing this advice touted is so frustrating. I have been training myself and others for 12 years, there are no excuses here.