4 ms·
I think you're making OP's point quite well albeit inadvertently. Personal ownership of a self-driving car is a ridiculous concept. Why would the car have to w
by smokinn 14y ago
I think you're making OP's point quite well albeit inadvertently.
Personal ownership of a self-driving car is a ridiculous concept. Why would the car have to wait around in the parking lot all day while you're at work? It could easily keep running around ferrying people places. And yet many people will want to own one simply because they think they should own a car.
I think the real future is a market for renting car time. Prices will be high during peak periods (morning and evening commuters) but cheap during the mid-afternoon.
The lack of a large up-front cost will likely drive adoption faster than many expect, especially given the new resistance to car ownership coming from younger people: http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2012/03/why-dont-young-americans-buy-cars/255001/ http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2012/03/why-dont...
I live in a city, as do pretty much all my friends. I walk almost everywhere and occasionally take a taxi when going out in the evenings. On rare occasions a friend with a ZipCar membership will ferry us out of town if we're going somewhere far. None of us actually own a car. We're the target market for the self-driving cars since we've already made the social adjustments.
- SoftwareMaven 14y agoOn the flip side, I'm a parent of four who would jump on this as a way to reduce from two to one cars while also reducing the pain of ferrying kids around to school, lessons, practice, recitals, etc. True self-driving (as opposed to "licensed driver paying attention but not needing to hold the wheel") will be adopted very quickly.
- brc 14y agoYou bring up an interesting point. Would you, as a parent, be happy with a driverless car going to collect your child from school/wherever? At what age of the child would you be happy with that?
- SoftwareMaven 14y agoEventually, yes, but not until they are of an age that they can reliably recognize their own car and are comfortable being alone forthe trip (sevenish, probably, but also depends on how long the trip is), though I can easily imagine some simple tools that would help pair child and car and comfort the child (nothing like watching videos to keep Tommy entertained on a drive).
- mkramlich 14y ago> Why would the car have to wait around in the parking lot all day while you're at work? It could easily keep running around ferrying people places. Yes those are called buses and taxis. :) they already exist. they're dirty. and they're not always available when you need them. One advantage to what you're proposing though is that unlike buses and trains you wouldn't have to put up with dirty, dangerous or rude people near you in the same vehicle.
- jonknee 14y agoWhy would there need to be other people in the car? It would most likely work just like cabs, but without a driver. You tap a button on your mobile and a car pulls up already knowing where you are going.
- DeepDuh 14y agoNote: We already have had that in Switzerland for several years now, it's quite popular: http://mobility.ch/en/pub/index.cfm http://mobility.ch/en/pub/index.cfm. They have self service rental cars all over the 'bigger' cities here (Note: Biggest inner city in Switzerland = ~0.5M). The major downside: You always need to bring back the car to where you took it. Automatic vehicles will make that concept even more viable. Designing a central scheduling agent would be quite a fun task. Traveling salesman problem here we come! ;)
- saryant 14y agoIt's been around in the US for at least four years, or at least that's when I remember first using ZipCar in Los Angeles. Hertz also has a competitor IIRC.
- deleted 14y ago[deleted]