2 ms·
This very misleading. It was an unusual per curiam opinion, not attributed to specific justices. The anonymous author of the opinion, who turned out to be Kenne
by lapcat 3y ago
This very misleading. It was an unusual per curiam opinion, not attributed to specific justices. The anonymous author of the opinion, who turned out to be Kennedy, “included Souter, Breyer and Stevens as agreeing that there were equal protection "problems" without consulting them.” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bush_v._Gore#Equal_Protection_Clause_2 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bush_v._Gore#Equal_Protection_...