3 ms·
If you have a rebut for Trump's position not being very consistent when it comes to China rather than your own headcannon, I'll be happy to hear it. Otherwise,
by latency-guy2 3y ago
If you have a rebut for Trump's position not being very consistent when it comes to China rather than your own headcannon, I'll be happy to hear it. Otherwise, you can leave this thread dead and annoy someone else.
- acdha 3y agoHint: it’s in the comment you replied to. Here’s an example: https://www.newsweek.com/donald-trumps-taiwan-remarks-spark-fury-concern-1862602 https://www.newsweek.com/donald-trumps-taiwan-remarks-spark-... From Taiwan’s perspective, the candidate who has repeatedly vowed that the United States will defend Taiwan is not the same as the one who refuses to take a position which should be easy and has a history of caving when an initial round of bluster fails (remember 2017 when he suddenly flipped to their One China policy?). They don’t want to have to guess whether they’re about to get sold out the next time someone in his family needs a favorable business deal to bail them out of a financial jam.
- latency-guy2 3y ago"One China" is the same policy that ALL presidents have agreed to, blue or red including the current one. This is not a political debate, this is the state's position (meaning the state of the USA) to agree to "One China". Taiwan can make assertions all they want, but you are really spreading some falsities around. If you don't believe me, what is the Biden's administration current position on the "One China" policy? Will you start calling Hunter Biden a CCP plant for consistency's sake? Why or why not? Try again.