3 ms·
I’d probably base my determination more on its actual functionality in practice, rather than soapboxing by a drive-by commenter that themselves admits that they
by cqqxo4zV46cp 3y ago
I’d probably base my determination more on its actual functionality in practice, rather than soapboxing by a drive-by commenter that themselves admits that they haven’t used it.
I’m not even a Chrome user, but come on…
- patmorgan23 3y ago60% of Google's revenue, $175 Billion came from advertising. Google Chrome will never implement a feature that threatens the company's primary source of revenue.
- gkbrk 3y agoAnd to the surprise of nobody, they do the opposite. Google Chrome selectively sends more data when vising Google domains compared to regular domains.
- not_really 3y agoNo, you come on. Chrome's "ad blocker" is objectively laughable, and the person you are responding to is pointing out that additionally there is a conflict of interest. Wouldn't matter even if the functionality was at parity with Ublock.