2 ms·
No mention of testing in the article. It seems odd how often accessibility advocates talk about following rules rather than testing. Shouldn’t we be testing wit
by skybrian 3y ago
No mention of testing in the article. It seems odd how often accessibility advocates talk about following rules rather than testing. Shouldn’t we be testing with screen readers or something?
If a website doesn’t work in Firefox, we fault the developer for not testing it in Firefox. Similarly for mobile browsers.
If testing is in place, LLM’s are much safer to use. You’ll notice when they give you code that doesn’t work.
- asadotzler 3y ago100% failure isn't really a useful test, is it?
- skybrian 3y agoI don't know what you mean. With test-first development, you write a failing test and then you fix it.