3 ms·
That would solve the compilation problem, but there is more to create a working binary. For MacOS the official (and I believe only legal) way is to use a Mac wi
by weinzierl 3y ago
That would solve the compilation problem, but there is more to create a working binary. For MacOS the official (and I believe only legal) way is to use a Mac with XCode installed for linking.
Now, you can download all the necessary files from a Mac and build a cross-compilation toolchain on your Linux system. I believe you could not legally distribute a project doing this and that is why these projects don't exist or are usually short-lived (with the notable exception of zig).
We will see how that goes for OP.
So, solutions like osxcross resort to shipping scripts that help you to acquire the necessary files and make that process easier.
The OP builds on osxcross, but is "batteries included".
zig has an even more difficult problem to solve because it tries to compile and link for many platforms. Shipping all the different requirements in their original form would make a zig distribution huge. So it does some clever magic I do not fully understand to create the necessary files from just the necessary subset of data. This reduces the size because there is overlap between platforms. It also means that they are not shipping the Mac files in their complete and original form and have gotten away with this legally so far.
At least that is what I believe is happening. I hope someone with more knowledge about zig could explain it better.
- adastra22 3y agoYou don’t need the OSX SDK to make runnable Rust binaries from other OS: https://betterprogramming.pub/cross-compiling-rust-from-mac-to-linux-7fad5a454ab1 https://betterprogramming.pub/cross-compiling-rust-from-mac-...
- weinzierl 3y agoThe link is about making Linux binaries on MacOS, which works because almost everything to build for Linux is already on OSX. The other way around it's not true. A Linux system does come neither with the OSX SDK nor the Apple patched llvm linker. I believe at least part of the required files cannot be legally distributed with a Linux system, but I might be wrong on that.
- adastra22 3y agoIt appears you’re right, thank you! I’m very surprised there isn’t a llvm linker available, minus all the foundation kits that rust doesn’t need.
- weinzierl 3y agoThe llvm linker is a cross-linker in principle. I think it is more about the specialities that Apple needs, like code signing.
- adastra22 3y agoAh. For what it's worth, those have been reverse engineered and copied elsewhere. I maintain a project that does cross-compiled macOS builds and our own signing on Linux.