3 ms·
I'm not familiar with the rules here but is not caring a complaint route to a defense? It can be in many other fields. I.e. purposefully don't have any monitor
by scarby2 3y ago
I'm not familiar with the rules here but is not caring a complaint route to a defense? It can be in many other fields.
I.e. purposefully don't have any monitoring, purposefully don't go to the site often etc. then only respond of someone tells you there's a problem.
I've dealt with a few contracts in the past that have stipulated that we must respond within xx hours of becoming aware of an issue, if I didn't want to run the service it would be in my interests to do everything in my power not to avoid becoming aware of any issues.
- gorlilla 3y agoYou appear to be conflating a few things. The 'contractor' timeliness of xx hours is typically stipulated in a contract as an Service Level Agreement (SLA) parameter. There are regulatory causes for 'xx' response times as well, outside of a contract. The first part you brought up was willful ignorance[0] which would likely come into play with licensing, insurability, as well as tort and criminal liabilities. [0]: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Willful_ignorance https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Willful_ignorance
- quesera 3y agoNo. If you hold a license, you are obligated to operate the station at the licensed power. Not caring is not allowed. In this case, they were required to operate the AM station to keep their FM license. In addition to the usual threats to license and fines etc, they were also risking their FM license which persumably was ROI positive.