3 ms·
Maybe such a weapon would violate MAD? So it becomes destabilizing? Also, one such Russian weapon would lead to massive budget boots for the US DoD. The MIC lov
by chiefalchemist 3y ago
Maybe such a weapon would violate MAD? So it becomes destabilizing? Also, one such Russian weapon would lead to massive budget boots for the US DoD. The MIC loves a good Red scare narrative.
As for the 130 counties, that's kinda comical. Only a handful of countries have nukes. Only a handful can put one in orbit. And only one of those countries has actually used nukes.
- jmpman 3y agoWouldn’t you simply put Kamala Harris permanently in a bunker? I believe these types of weapons are for first strike decapitation.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- chiefalchemist 3y agoGiven there are deep ocean subs with nukes, unless you can decapitate those there's no such thing. Moi? The whole idea (survival nuclear war) is so absurd that any such discussion borders on (political) theatre. It's the narrative power dreams up to maintain a state of fear; to justify their existence to the proles. It's a page(s) out of 1984, while the masses are distracted into submission a la Brave New World.