>I think we're arguing over subjectivities here -- comprehensibility is entirely dependent on the people involved as much as the language in question. If you're

>I think we're arguing over subjectivities here -- comprehensibility is entirely dependent on the people involved as much as the language in question. If you're better at Java than Haskell, you'll find it easier to follow, and vice-versa; I know people in each category. I maybe arguing over subjectivities, but subjectivities turn into objectivities with the tool of statistics. And I think that in general (statistically), people find Haskell more difficult than Java.