3 ms·
Imagine the same statement being made about medical malpractice. At the end of the day, I'm OK with "random" juries making these decisions. There is quite a bi
by carbocation 15y ago
Imagine the same statement being made about medical malpractice.
At the end of the day, I'm OK with "random" juries making these decisions. There is quite a bit of apparatus in place to prevent major error, and the law can always be changed (obviously it's not easy to do so, but it's possbile) in response to an undesirable decision.
- bhousel 15y agoI think even in cases of medical malpractice, most parties would better be served through arbitration than through a jury trial.
- rayiner 15y agoArbitration is terrible. Arbitrators have a huge incentive to be biased in favor of the party that will bring them repeat business (the insurance company). Arbitration vastly prejudices the little guy in these disputes.