4 ms·

Addictions do not have to be life destroying. Plenty of people are addicted to various things but are fully functional and live fulfilled lives. It’s a bit unf

Addictions do not have to be life destroying. Plenty of people are addicted to various things but are fully functional and live fulfilled lives. It’s a bit unfair to ask whether OP wants words to have any meaning when it seems you’re a bit fuzzy on the definition of “addiction” yourself.

andsoitis 3y ago
> Addictions do not have to be life destroying. Plenty of people are addicted to various things but are fully functional and live fulfilled lives. It’s a bit unfair to ask whether OP wants words to have any meaning when it seems you’re a bit fuzzy on the definition of “addiction” yourself. Wikipedia: Addiction is a neuropsychological disorder characterized by a persistent and intense urge to use a drug or engage in a behaviour that produces natural reward, despite substantial harm and other negative consequences. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Addiction https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Addiction
- jjulius 3y ago
  Wikipedia isn't really an authority on words, specifically, though. If one goes to Merriam-Webster, an actual dictionary, one sees: > a: exhibiting a compulsive, chronic, physiological or psychological need for a habit-forming substance, behavior, or activity > b: strongly inclined to do, use, or indulge in something repeatedly If one looks at the Oxford English Dictionary, one sees: > a state of dependence produced either by the habitual taking of drugs or by regularly engaging in certain behaviours (e.g. gambling). No specific requirement for negative consequences, just a habit.
  - andsoitis 3y ago
    > No specific requirement for negative consequences, just a habit. If addiction is not a psychological or physical dependency with harmful or destructive consequences, what should we call those that do? The American Psychiatric Association has this to say about addiction, which tells me they view addiction as something worth fixing and hence is harmful: https://www.psychiatry.org/getmedia/e25c07ae-7333-4466-9add-5fe75ffce45e/Addiction-Top-10-Public-FINAL.pdf https://www.psychiatry.org/getmedia/e25c07ae-7333-4466-9add-...
lkdfjlkdfjlg 3y ago
No, I'm not fuzzy on the definition of addiction. If a behavior has little negative effects, then it's not an addiction.
- rysertio 3y ago
  Most mildly addictive drugs don't have that many negative effects.
  - bluefirebrand 3y ago
    It can be a negative effect like "I decided to skip work to do the drug instead and lost my job"
    - deleted 3y ago
      [deleted]
- jjulius 3y ago
  I dunno how else to say that not having negative effects doesn't mean one isn't addicted to something. It simply isn't a requirement.
  - alpaca128 3y ago
    > It simply isn't a requirement. A third of the diagnostic criteria for substance addiction are about negative effects in the person's life. Perhaps it's not strictly a requirement but often it's only a question of time.
- d1sxeyes 3y ago
  I don’t think that’s correct. Others have linked to various respectable dictionaries that support my definition.

andsoitis 3y ago

> Addictions do not have to be life destroying. Plenty of people are addicted to various things but are fully functional and live fulfilled lives. It’s a bit unfair to ask whether OP wants words to have any meaning when it seems you’re a bit fuzzy on the definition of “addiction” yourself. Wikipedia: Addiction is a neuropsychological disorder characterized by a persistent and intense urge to use a drug or engage in a behaviour that produces natural reward, despite substantial harm and other negative consequences. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Addiction https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Addiction

jjulius 3y ago
Wikipedia isn't really an authority on words, specifically, though. If one goes to Merriam-Webster, an actual dictionary, one sees: > a: exhibiting a compulsive, chronic, physiological or psychological need for a habit-forming substance, behavior, or activity > b: strongly inclined to do, use, or indulge in something repeatedly If one looks at the Oxford English Dictionary, one sees: > a state of dependence produced either by the habitual taking of drugs or by regularly engaging in certain behaviours (e.g. gambling). No specific requirement for negative consequences, just a habit.
- andsoitis 3y ago
  > No specific requirement for negative consequences, just a habit. If addiction is not a psychological or physical dependency with harmful or destructive consequences, what should we call those that do? The American Psychiatric Association has this to say about addiction, which tells me they view addiction as something worth fixing and hence is harmful: https://www.psychiatry.org/getmedia/e25c07ae-7333-4466-9add-5fe75ffce45e/Addiction-Top-10-Public-FINAL.pdf https://www.psychiatry.org/getmedia/e25c07ae-7333-4466-9add-...

lkdfjlkdfjlg 3y ago

No, I'm not fuzzy on the definition of addiction. If a behavior has little negative effects, then it's not an addiction.

rysertio 3y ago
Most mildly addictive drugs don't have that many negative effects.
- bluefirebrand 3y ago
  It can be a negative effect like "I decided to skip work to do the drug instead and lost my job"
  - deleted 3y ago
    [deleted]
jjulius 3y ago
I dunno how else to say that not having negative effects doesn't mean one isn't addicted to something. It simply isn't a requirement.
- alpaca128 3y ago
  > It simply isn't a requirement. A third of the diagnostic criteria for substance addiction are about negative effects in the person's life. Perhaps it's not strictly a requirement but often it's only a question of time.
d1sxeyes 3y ago
I don’t think that’s correct. Others have linked to various respectable dictionaries that support my definition.